Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Have a Heart (A Story of Social Justice)


Imagine, if you will, a young couple with stars in their eyes. They’re so in love they can't hardly stand it. Then one day, the girl discovers she is pregnant. She, having mixed emotions about the pregnancy and can’t decide whether to be happy because she’s excited to be a mother, or be scared because she isn’t in a family who would approve of such circumstances. The guy also cannot decide, for he too is excited for his growing family, but is acutely aware of the precious few dollars he has to his name. 
The family and friends surrounding this couple say to them that they were altogether hasty in their relationship, that marriage is not a good idea, and the child is the product of the sin of fornication. The couple was told by the pastors in their church that unless they split up, they cannot be a part of the church because their relationship is not Godly. The couple decides to elope, and the very next day, the young girl's enraged father cancels her from his health insurance plan. The couple has nothing. The girl is a few months pregnant and in need of her first obstetrics check-up. The guy works for two dollars an hour above minimum wage, and the girl fears that her growing belly might now be noticeable to any potential employers. They live in a shabby, run-down, one-bedroom apartment.
At the advice of a friend, the couple knocks on the door of a local Department of Social Services (DSS) branch. She needs to begin thinking of medical care for her and her baby. The social worker, without hesitation, signs them up on state medical insurance (Medicaid), and then asks them how they plan to eat. The couple, not realizing what the social worker meant looked at one another and shrugged. “Buy food, I guess,” the young girl said. The social worker then told them about government issued EBT cards (formally food stamps) and approved the couple for those benefits as well. 
Over the next few months, they young man acquired a construction job with only slightly better pay and with no benefits. The girl managed to find a minimum-wage job at a café with meager tips, yet the manager was gracious. The couple still had very little money to their name, but they were taken care of by the the welfare system that would take care of them -- instead of the church that wouldn’t. 
Years passed. The couple stayed together through it all and delighted in their child. Both the young man and young woman attended the university with the help of welfare to aid in expenses. The young woman  had dealt with nasty looks form the checker when she paid for groceries with her EBT card. Her child had a black eye, but what the clerk didn’t know was that her child had just begun walking and had tottered into the corner of the coffee table. 
The young man, who graduated first, couldn’t find employment in his field that made much more than he did before he attended college. At just $1,800 per month in income, the couple was $100 over budget for EBT benefits; however, the young man loved his new job, and though he now had the option of health insurance for his family through his employer, he could not afford the premiums which were $480 per month, so he and his wife lived without healthcare while they depended on Medicaid for their child’s healthcare, which ranged from childhood illnesses, immunizations, and to well-child check-ups.
The man went on for his master’s degree, still depending on Medicaid for his child’s medical care. He once got the stomach flu so badly that he had to be hospitalized. Two hours, a basic medical exam, one x-ray, one prescription, and a bag of IV fluids later, he was released, costing him all $2,500 of his family’s federal tax return (which included Earned Income Credit). When fuel prices sky-rocketed, he rode his bike to work and school and applied for heating assistance through DSS. The young woman, after years of part-time schooling because she also was a stay-at-home parent, also graduated with a degree and began working. And after 7 years, the couple finally earned enough money to support their family without the help of welfare.
What you don’t know about this couple is that both sets of their parents and multiple aunts and uncles and cousins had also taken advantage of welfare programs when their families were young and times were tough. None of those members are currently enrolled welfare benefits, and haven't been for years.

Knowing what you know now about this couple’s story, what would you say about:

1. The church and other religious organizations being the entities that facilitate taking care of the poor?

2. The idea that the poor are poor because they choose to be poor?

3. The dire need for some kind of healthcare reform?

4. The idea that everyone should have access to affordable healthcare?

5. Mandatory drug testing for all applicants and recipients of welfare programs?

6. The opinions that you yourself have unwittingly formed about certain social demographics?

7. More tax breaks and benefits for the poor, particularly concerning earned income credit (EIC)?

8. The catch-22 each woman is put in when evaluating her options (damned if she has a "welfare baby", damned if she doesn't)?

9.The idea that welfare programs keep people dependent on welfare programs?

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I cannot believe what I've read. I'm actually pretty mad. I feel a bit of nausea now.
I think you are a wonderful writer! This story is so close in relation to my own circumstances growing into my adult years. I cannot believe the similarities! It was like you were writing about me! =)
Thank you for sharing this!!
Beki

Anonymous said...

Great post Michaelia.

We used Medicaid when we had Hannah, but we dropped it once we could afford to get the insurance through Jeremiah's job. Since I stay at home, though, we still qualify for CHIP. It's not fair that people are judged for using state-funded health insurance for their kids because they choose to stay home instead of using daycare! As a society, we should be encouraging parents to be with their young babies and toddlers and if that results in more mothers on Medicaid for awhile, so be it.

Anonymous said...

Great post. I am so glad the couple had the courage to get the care they needed. It is a shame that the US has a higher death in childbirth rate than many countries. We also have a higher abortion rate. etc etc. Lack of available healthcare costs the US dearly.

When I read criticism of Obamacare that is one sided, ignoring the horrible costs of inadequate care, I wonder how we dare call ourselves a Christian nation?

Thanks so much, Alietha.

carla rae said...

when i lived in minneapolis, my roommate and dear friend erika was struggling with severe mental illness. we attended a megachurch a few suburbs over. eventually erika she reached a point where she couldn't keep a job and needed someplace to live where she wouldn't have to worry about paying rent and could just focus on getting better. so she called the church, where thousands of people attended every sunday.

long story short, thank heavens for the social safety net of minnesota, which enabled her to qualify for disabled housing, paid for her day treatment and weekly therapy appointments, and gave her food stamps. thanks to that support (and no thanks to the megachurch) she is recovered and healthy today. would you be surprised that she's taking a break from christians?

when people say that it is the church, not the government, who should be taking care of the widows and orphans and sick among us, i say "go ahead!"

--carla

Michaelia Elizabeth said...

Thanks, Carla. Yes, that sounds pretty typical from what I've experienced and have seen of religious institutions I've been a part of. If you don't fit their ideal of what you need to strive toward, you're unworthy of the assistance. I am very close to an individual who has never been more mentally stable than now. Behavior Management has been a life saver for that person.

I think we (humanity, collectively) rely too much on our individual senses of justice, never taking into account the different variables that could be considered. One commentator of this link on my Facebook page was hell bent on the idea that the system does create dependence, and while I could see the scenarios she presented, I do think those scenarios clearly pointed to those individual's ability to reason, which in turn, can point to an underlying mental illness. I think (if we are good Bible-believing Christians), that scripture is clear about our responsibility to take care of the poor. Period.

I also think that the evangelical churches tend to have this military-type mindset that one must "pull himself up by his boot straps" or he doesn't deserve help. Or even that "God helps those who help themselves." I think these ideas are assuming that people in need of services are of the same mind as you...and that's making the huge assumption that you yourself are in your right mind.

Bottom line: if a person believes that the church should be the entity to help the poor, then by all means (like you said), he should do it! But please don't vote for measures that would prevent social welfare institutions from doing the same. If that if Christians within that religious institution's motives are pure, then there should be no conflict of interest.

Michaelia Elizabeth said...

**If Christians within that religious institution's motives are pure, then there should be no conflict of interest.